Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 28.06.2025 06:00

Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Judge denies defense motion to move R. Kelly to home detention - NBC News
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Just in the last 5 years:
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
For the Best Fat-Burning Exercises, Slow and Sustainable Wins the Abs Race - GQ
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
What’s next?
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Google Search Tests Audio Overview - Search Engine Roundtable
Thank you.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Is The Last of Us Part 2 really as woke as people say it is?
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Obesity Newcomer Metsera, Up 23%, Enters The Ring With A Punch - Investor's Business Daily
Russia can stop this any time.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
GM plans $4 billion push to move production from Mexico to U.S. - The Detroit News